...
Indicator
...
Criteria
...
Comments
...
Score (for each level)
...
Instructions
...
Metadata
...
Metadata Score
...
5
...
Date of dataset
...
Is the date of the dataset indicated?
...
1
...
...
Clear source
...
Is the data source clearly indicated and defined?
...
1
...
...
Clear methodology/comments
...
Is there methodology or comments contained clarifying information?
...
1
...
...
License
...
Can the dataset be shared? Is the type of license/rights of use defined?
...
1
...
Spatial dataset
...
Is there a file for each level? Can a lower level be used to create upper levels?
...
1
...
Attribute structure
...
Attribute Score
...
12
...
Polygon count check
...
Is the count accurate? (examine against government maps or other sources / wiki / GADM)
...
1
...
Shp is polygon
...
Does the shapefile contain only polygons shapes? If not can polygon be created from it easily? (a test should be done)
...
1
...
No missing AB level names
...
Are there names in all records? if not can they be identified?
...
1
...
Clear column names
...
Can the data be understood? If not is there metadata to explain it?
...
1
...
Lower levels have higher attributes included
...
Do the lower admin boundaries have the higher admin boundaries in the shp? If not can they be easily added?
...
1
...
P-Codes constructed
...
Do the P-codes incorporate values from higher levels? If not can they be constructed?
...
3
...
...
Only unique names
...
Is there any duplicate names within the level? If there is are the P-codes unique?
...
1
...
Duplicate attributes check tutorial
...
Only unique P-Codes
...
Is there any duplicate P-codes within the level?
...
3
...
Duplicate attributes check tutorial
...
Parentage checks
...
Parentage Score
...
6
...
P-Code parentage check
...
Does each admin level have upper level P-codes? Is the hierarchy the same between levels?
...
3
...
...
Name parentage check
...
Does each admin level have upper level names? Is the hierarchy the same between levels?
...
3
...
...
Spatial checks
...
Spatial Score
...
4
...
Geometric nesting
...
Are there issues with topology? This is a quick check to see if there are topological errors
...
2
...
...
Topology errors
...
Are they some gaps or overlaps within the layers?
...
1
...
...
Entire country is covered
...
Do the different level span the entire country? If part of the country is missing is required? Is an another source able to fill it?
...
1
...
Link to COD-PS check
...
Link Score
...
3
...
AB joins to PS
...
Did the PS join to AB levels work?
...
3
...
...
Other comments
...
Total Score
...
The information in this section is also broadly applicable to Edge-matched administrative boundary dataset (COD-EM) CODs. |
COD-AB (and COD-EM) datasets are categorized as ‘standard’ and ‘enhanced’ CODs.
There is an analogous categorization for Population Statistics Common Operational Datasets (COD-PS).
Enhanced CODs
Enhanced CODs have undergone improved development and quality control. Enhanced COD-AB and COD-EM datasets have been geometry and attribute quality controlled and prepared to a standardized schema by ITOS. (See COD-AB geoservices for more information about ITOS). Enhanced CODs are identified in HDX datasets views and on their HDX dataset pages with a “COD+” icon.
...
Standard CODs
Standard COD-ABs are those that are not ‘Enhanced’. These include many older COD-AB datasets. They may lack geometric and attribute quality control and may not adhere to the standardized schema.
Standard CODs are identified in HDX dataset views and on their HDX dataset pages with a “COD” icon.
...
Most new or recently updated COD-AB and COD-EM datasets are enhanced.